Basic Prerequisites: 05 · Martingales.
1. Intuition & Practical Objective
These are the foundations of the foundations: the results that make “expectation” and “conditioning” well-defined and the theorems that let you move limits inside expectations. Radon–Nikodym turns one measure into another as a density - the mathematical license for the risk-neutral change of measure. The convergence theorems (Monotone, Fatou, Dominated) are why you may stop a martingale and let , pass a limit under , or claim almost surely (Glasserman §1.1). The Lebesgue/standard machine is how expectation itself is built on uncountable spaces.
The practical objective: understand the complete toolkit that (a) proves a conditional expectation exists (via Radon–Nikodym, Shreve I §9.5); (b) makes the change of measure rigorous (Shreve II §1.6; Shreve I Ch 9); (c) justifies every Monte Carlo and every discrete limit - the theoretical reason “it’s just an average” is sound.
2. Mathematical Ground Truth & Derivations
2.1 Radon–Nikodym & change of measure (Shreve II Thm 1.6.1; Shreve I Ch 9)
is absolutely continuous w.r.t. () if . Then there is a nonnegative with
Equivalence () iff a.s.; then is the RN derivative of w.r.t. and (Shreve II Thm 1.6.1; Shreve I Ch 9). Existence of conditional expectation as a corollary (Shreve I §9.5): for with , define on a sub--algebra ; the RN derivative of w.r.t. restricted to is -measurable and has the partial-averaging property, so it is .
On the finite market (Shreve I Ex 9.1), gives (verified), and is a -martingale; the state-price density is with a -martingale and European value (Shreve I Ch 9).
2.2 Expectation = the Lebesgue integral & the standard machine (Shreve II §1.4–1.5)
The integral is built on the -axis partition (Lebesgue, not Riemann): indicator simple nonnegative general. Computation via density: (Shreve I Thm 3.32); the density is the RN derivative of the law w.r.t. Lebesgue measure.
2.3 The convergence theorems (Shreve II Thms 1.4.5/1.4.9)
- Monotone Convergence (MCT): a.s. .
- Fatou’s Lemma: .
- Dominated Convergence (DCT): a.s. and integrable .
These justify passing limits through expectations everywhere in Ch 3 - the stopped exponential martingale with dominated/monotone convergence yields and (Shreve II Thm 3.6.2, Remark 3.6.3). The SLLN/CLT that run Monte Carlo are themselves consequences (Glasserman §1.1).
2.4 Conditional expectation as orthogonal projection (Shreve II Def 2.3.1)
minimizes over -measurable : the residual is orthogonal to every -measurable variable, . This is the measure-theoretic statement of “best predictor,” and the root of the ESL regression function (ESL eq. 2.13) and its MSE decomposition.
3. Computational Implementation - verify RN derivative, the projection, and CLT
Check the discrete RN derivative values, the orthogonality of the conditional-expectation residual, and the CLT standard error of an MC estimator. Stdlib only.
4. Failure Modes & First-Principles Breakdowns
- Missing the absolute-continuity direction. Radon–Nikodym builds from a density with ; equivalence is the extra a.s. assumption (Shreve II Thm 1.6.1). Assuming equivalence when only absolute continuity holds, or vice-versa, silently breaks the inverse density .
- Exchanging limit and expectation without a convergence theorem. is false in general; only under MCT (monotone), Fatou (inequality), or DCT (dominated) does it hold (Shreve II §1.4). The stopped-martingale first-passage computation relies exactly on this.
- Requiring densities where there are none. Not every law has a density - is exactly the condition (Shreve I Ch 11). The pair has no joint density despite each marginal being normal; forcing one misrepresents the dependence.
- Treating the MC average as deterministic. is a random variable whose error is ; without SLLN/CLT you cannot justify either convergence or the error bar (Glasserman §1.1).
- Confusing measurability with integrability. A random variable can be -measurable yet non-integrable; expectation and conditional expectation are defined only on (suitable) integrable objects. Unbounded payoffs need the standard machine’s limit step.
5. References
- Shreve, Stochastic Calculus for Finance II
- Shreve, Stochastic Calculus for Finance I
- Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering
- Casella & Berger, Statistical Inference
6. Connected Graph Bridges
- Back: 05 · Martingales · Index Hub
- Forward topic-folder: Stochastic Calculus (Girsanov as the continuous Radon–Nikodym, martingale representation) · Monte Carlo (SLLN/CLT in practice)
- Theory: Black–Scholes–Merton (risk-neutral pricing is a RN measure change) · No-Arbitrage & Binomial Trees